|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Stacey, Natasha; CDU; natasha.stacey@cdu.edu.au; Izurieta, Arturo; Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University; arturo.izurieta@cdu.edu.au; Garnett, Stephen T; Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University; stephen.garnett@cdu.edu.au. |
Responsibility for the management of many protected areas in the Northern Territory, Australia, is shared between the management agency and the aboriginal owners of that land. We describe (1) the creation and types of indicators developed by partners in a participatory process to measure management effectiveness, (2) the assessment method used to monitor progress, and (3) the results of the first cycle of evaluations in four jointly managed parks. Although each pilot park area has distinctive features, we were able to identify a set of twelve common indicators that were applied across the four park areas. The agreed indicators, which were scored using a color scale to indicate level of achievement, were primarily concerned with process rather than outcome,... |
Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Effectiveness; Indicators; Indigenous; Joint management; National parks; Participatory monitoring and evaluation; Traditional owners. |
Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
Feinerman, Eli; Fleischer, Aliza; Simhon, Avi. |
This study examines the optimal allocation of funds between national and urban parks. Since travel costs to national parks are significantly higher than to urban parks, poor households tend to visit the latter more frequently, whereas rich households favor the former. Therefore, allocating public funds to improving the quality of national parks at the expense of urban parks disproportionately benefits high income households. By developing a theoretical model and implementing it using Israeli data, findings indicate all households, except for the richest decile, prefer that the park authority divert a larger proportion of its budget from national to urban parks. |
Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Budget allocation; Income distribution; National parks; Urban parks; Public Economics. |
Ano: 2004 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/31105 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|